![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:30 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Hi. This is simple. I am going to rank the full history of Mazda RX-* body styles in ascending order. The deciding factor in assigning rank? How much of an eye-boner I get from looking at them, ie. how much the little Desu below my waist proclaims "Me Gusta" upon laying eyes upon said vehicles.
SA22C RX-7:
RX-2:
RX-3:
RX-8:
FD RX-7:
FC RX-7:
RX-4:
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:32 |
|
you called your Desu little
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:33 |
|
Is he 5'11" and 220lbs?
No? Then he is little. By comparison. :-P
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:33 |
|
:V
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:34 |
|
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:35 |
|
Lol, the wagon versions crossed my mind, but I decided to limit it to coupes, just for the sake as consistency.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:40 |
|
Not bad, but FD is all time maximum eye boner for me when we're talking Japanese cars. 10/10
Then comes the rx4 which is 8/10
Somehow the rx8 slots between the rx4 and the rx3 with about 7.8 eyeboners.
Rx3 is close at a 7.5 on the pupil erection scale
Next is the fc. A Decent but not amazing 7 on the occipital engorgement rating.
First gen rx7s are better than average looking but nothing too special, they rate about a 6.
Finally the rx2 which is just sort of okay. Half a retnarection rates it a 5.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:40 |
|
it gives me a family car boner.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:41 |
|
I've always felt like the FD tries too hard in terms of styling, lol.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:48 |
|
I prefer them without wing and stock body kit, but the base design is just amazing to my eyes.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:49 |
|
The SA22C can look quite nice when properly equipped. That RX-4 looks great, too.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:51 |
|
Nope, sorry. Still doesn't do it for me, haha.
![]() 02/17/2014 at 20:53 |
|
I think the FC looks better than the FD too!!!